Irfan Yusuf Shaikh and Anr. v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Bombay dismissed an anticipatory bail application as withdrawn by the applicants' counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 Yadav 910.aba.179.19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 179 OF 2019
Irfan Yusuf Shaikh & Anr. … Applicants Versus The State of Maharashtra … Respondent
Mr. Aniket Nikam I/by Vivek N. Arote for Applicants. Mr. N. B. Patil, APP for Respondent – State.
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. DATE : JANUARY 22, 2019.
P.C. :
. The learned Counsel for Applicants, upon instruction, makes
a motion for withdrawal of the present Application.
withdrawn.
(NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)
Irfan Yusuf Shaikh & Anr.
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court