The court confirmed interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant, noting that the investigation is complete and custodial interrogation is unnecessary.
Interim anticipatory bail order dated 30th July, 2018 confirmed; application allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm 1 911-aba173.18.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 173 OF 2018
Nitin Ashok Maniyar
….Applicant.
Vs.
The Union of India ….Respondent.
Mr. K.K. Holambe Patil for the Applicant. Ms. Ameeta Kuttikrishnan for Respondent No.1. Mr. Amit Palkar APP, for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J. DATE : 13th MARCH, 2019.
P.C.:-
The Applicant was granted interim relief by an Order dated 30th July, 2018.
2 The learned counsel appearing for the Applicant submitted that the Investigating Officer, by its letter dated 25th January, 2019, has directed the Applicant to attend the Trial Court, as he intends to submit charge-sheet. He tendered across the bar the said letter dated 25th January, 2019. The same is taken on record and marked “X” for identification. In the said letter, the Investigating Officer has stated that, the Investigation against the Applicant is completed and the charge- sheet is being filed before the Sessions Court at Mumbai.
1/2
ssm 2 911-aba173.18.doc
3 In view thereof, the custodial interrogation of the Applicant for further investigation of the present crime is not necessary. The interim relief granted by an Order dated 30th July, 2018 is hereby confirmed.
(A.S. GADKARI, J.)
2/2
Nitin Ashok Maniyar
The Union of India
A. S. GADKARI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
