Dismissed
Mukund Bhaguji Phatangare v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Bombay HCABA/1090/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
109019.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10-ABA 1090-19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1090 OF 2019
Mukund Bhaguji Phatangare ...Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J. DATE : 14th AUGUST, 2019
P.C. :
for the applicant. On 7th June 2019, when the matter was called
out in the court, nobody had appeared in the court.
prosecution.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Nikita Gadgil
1/1
Mukund Bhaguji Phatangare
State of Maharashtra
SARANG V. KOTWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court