Disposed

Hiranandani Construction Private Limited and 3 Ors. v. Hiranandani Living Private Limited and 2 Ors.

Bombay HC22 Jul 2019S/210/2014

Download

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

COURT

What did the court decide?

Suit disposed based on consent terms dated 19th July 2019; Registrar of trademark directed to dispose withdrawal and cancellation applications; interim orders vacated.

What the court decided

AI extract

Hiranandani Construction Private Limited and 3 Ors. Vs Hiranandani Living Private Limited and 2 Ors. — Bombay HC (2019) — LawSathi Research

¶1

31.S-210-2014.doc

¶2

Tandle

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY AND ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶4

SUIT NO. 210 OF 2014

¶5

WITH

¶6

NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1058 OF 2016

¶7

WITH

¶8

CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 744 OF 2019

¶9

¶10

SUIT NO. 210 OF 2014.

¶11

Hiranandani Construction Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. … Plaintiffs.

¶12

Versus

¶13

Hiranandani Living Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. … Defendants.

¶14

. . . . . .

¶15

Mr. Virag Tulzapurkar, Sr. Counsel and Mr. Mustafa Safiyuddin & Mr. Hassan Safiyuddin i/b ABH Law LLP for Plaintiffs. Mr. F. E. DeVitre, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Dharmesh Jain i/b Anil T. Agarwal for Defendants.

¶16

. . . . . .

¶17

CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM, J. DATE : 22^nd JULY, 2019

¶18

P. C. :

¶19

Mr. Virag Tulzapurkar submits that parties have amicably

¶20

settled the matter and tenders consent terms dated 19^th July 2019.

¶21

The consent terms is signed by the authorised signatory of plaintiff nos. 1 to 4, defendant no. 2 for himself and as Director of defendant no.1 and authorised signatory of defendant no.4, defendant no.3 for herself and an authorised signatory of defendant no.5 and their Advocates on record. The authorised signatory of plaintiff nos.1 to 4 and defendant no.2 and defendant no.3 are present in the Court and identified by the Advocates on record.

¶22

1/6

¶23

31.S-210-2014.doc

¶24

The parties themselves have also signed in addition to the Authorized Signatories. The Advocates on record identifying their signatures. The Consent Terms is taken on record and marked as “X” for identification.

¶25

For ease of reference, the consent terms is scanned and and reproduced herein below:-

2/6

31.S-210-2014.doc

3/6

31.S-210-2014.doc

4/6

31.S-210-2014.doc

5/6

31.S-210-2014.doc

Order in terms of consent terms, all statements accepted as

¶35

undertaking to this Court. All undertaking given in the consent terms are also accepted.

¶36

The Registrar of trademark is directed to consider and

¶37

dispose the application for withdrawal and cancellation as provided in consent terms as expeditiously as possible.

¶38

Suit accordingly stands disposed. No order as to costs.

¶39

Refund, if any, of court fees in accordance with rules.

¶40

All interim orders stand vacated and all interim applications

¶41

stand disposed.

¶42

All to act on authenticated copy of this order.

¶43

6/6

Hiranandani Construction Private Limited and 3 Ors. v. Hiranandani Living Private Limited and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Hiranandani Construction Private Limited and 3 Ors. v. Hiranandani Living Private Limited and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Official Liquidator Vs Accentia Technologies Ltd, Cin NO.L99999MH19991PLC062885

Mr. Biswanath Deb Vs the Owners and Parties Interested in the Vessel Glory-I Represented by Its Master

Official Liquidator Vs Ankur Drugs and Pharma Ltd.

The Mobile Store Services Limited and Arn. Vs Tara India Fund III Domestic Trust and 2 Ors.

Jog Engineering Ltd. Vs the Official Liquidator of Masvy and Co.Pvt.Ltd and Anr.

Cedric Merwyn Creado and Anr. Vs Akruti Nirman Pvt. Ltd. 21 Ors. and Shivram Shivjor Yadav and Anr. (Applicants)