Single judge disposed of a commercial suit after parties filed signed consent terms in court confirming a settlement.
Consent terms marked; undertakings accepted; suit disposed and decree drawn up; court fees refunded; interlocutory applications disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11-COMSL-533-19-NMCDL-1158-19.doc
Dixit
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMMERCIAL SUIT (LODGING) NO.533 OF 2019 ALONG WITH
NOTICE OF MOTION (LODGING) NO.1158 OF 2019
Vinod Thavar Gada ….Plaintiff-Applicant
V/s.
Tanishq Builders, Mumbai ….Defendant
Mr. Nishit Tanna, with Ms. S.K. Electricwala, i/by Ms. Pushpa Pasi, for the Plaintiff-Applicant.
Mr. S.R. Rawell for the Defendant.
CORAM : A.K. MENON, J.
DATED : 3RD OCTOBER, 2019.
P.C. :
terms are present in court. They all confirm execution of the consent terms. In view thereof, I pass the following order :-
1/2
11-COMSL-533-19-NMCDL-1158-19.doc
(A.K. MENON, J.)
2/2
Vinod Thavar Gada
Tanishq Builders, Mumbai
A.K. MENON
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
