In CrW.P. No. 90 of 2018, the High Court of Bombay at Goa allowed the petitioner's writ petition. The single-judge Bench set aside the impugned order issuing process and dismissed the respondent's complaint without recording reasons.
The impugned order issuing process is set aside and the complaint filed by the respondent is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 90 OF 2018
DOMINA DE SOUZA.,
Versus
KAMLAKANT SAWANT., ... Respondent
Shri Somnath B. Karpe, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Abhijit Pramod Gosavi, Advocate for the respondent.
Date:26th July 2018
P.C.
For reasons to be separately recorded later, the petition is allowed. The impugned order issuing process is hereby set aside. The complaint filed by the respondent is hereby dismissed.
C. V. BHADANG, J.
SMA
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order issuing process should be set aside.
Whether the complaint filed by the respondent should be dismissed.
DOMINA DE SOUZA
KAMLAKANT SAWANT
C. V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
