Disposed of a criminal writ petition arising under the Domestic Violence Act where parties amicably settled the dispute and produced consent terms signed by them. No order as to costs passed.
Petition disposed of without making any order as to costs. Consent terms marked X.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WPCR No. 211 of 2017
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 211 OF 2017
Vingul Roman Ferrao & 2 Ors. ... Petitioners Versus Albertina Arlina Da Silva e Ferrao ... Respondent ***
Shri Ashwin D. Bhobe, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Shri Joaquim Godinho, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM:- C.V. BHADANG, J. DATE:- 19th JUNE 2018
ORAL ORDER:
The parties have amicably settled their dispute and have produced the consent terms duly signed by the parties as well as their Advocates, which is taken on record and marked 'X' for identification.
WPCR No. 211 of 2017
2
C.V. BHADANG, J.
EV
Vingul Roman Ferrao & 2 Ors.
Albertina Arlina Da Silva e Ferrao
C.V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
