Petitioner sought withdrawal of Writ Petition No. 9769 of 2018 after filing written instructions. High Court read the instructions and disposed of the petition as withdrawn.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp9769.18
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.9769 OF 2018
SANTOSH NANASAHEB GAIKWAD
VERSUS
THE SECRETARY DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE AURANGABAD
ANDCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Advocate for Petitioner : Mrs. Charuta S. Deshmukh
Advocate for Respondents : Mr. S.B. kakde
CORAM : N. M. JAMDAR, J.
DATED : 10 DECEMBER 2018
PER COURT:-
Te learned counsel for the petitioner states that she has
received written instructions to withdraw this writ petition. A photo
copy of the said written instructions is taken on record and marked
“X” for identification. Te writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
( N. M. JAMDAR, J.)
rlj/
SANTOSH NANASAHEB GAIKWAD
THE SECRETARY DISTRICT LEVEL COMMITTEE AURANGABAD AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
N. M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court