Petitioner, a prisoner, approached the Court seeking reduction of remission days and release on parole. The Court noted non-compliance with a previous bond order. The petition was rejected without costs.
Petition rejected. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
cwp960.17.O.odt 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.960 OF 2017
(Nitin Nandkishor Gudadhe Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. the Secretary of Home Department and another)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar’s Orders.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Mrs. Sunita Paul, Advocate (Appointed) for Petitioner. Shri M. Pathan, APP for Respondent/State.
CORAM: B.R. GAVAI AND
M.G. GIRATKAR, JJ. DATE: 20th MARCH, 2018.
The petitioner put forth the petition.
The petitioner has prayed for reduction of remission of 81 days to 27 days which prisoner was imposed on account of late surrender.
The petitioner also prayed for releasing him on parole in view of order passed by this Court dated 27.09.2015. Perusal of the affidavit dated 05.03.2018 filed by Superintendent of Police, Amravati would reveal that the proposal submitted by the prison authority for imposing reduction of remission of 81 days has been confirmed by the learned Sessions Judge, Amravati.
In so far as the second affidavit is concerned, the learned APP submit that in pursuance to the order passed by this Court dated 22.09.2016 the petitioner was directed to execute a bond. However, the petitioner had not execute
cwp960.17.O.odt 2
bond and should not be released at that point of time.
No case is made out for releasing him on parole. Petition is rejected. No costs.
JUDGE
JUDGE
NSN
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to reduction of remission days and release on parole.
Whether the petitioner is eligible for release on parole in light of a previous order.
Nitin Nandkishor Gudadhe
State of Maharashtra
B.R. GAVAI
M.G. GIRATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
