This single bench rejected a writ petition where petitioners claimed rental compensation for land after the date of market value determination. The court found no substance in the petition based on the respondents' reply.
Petition rejected with no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
1602wp928.18
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 928/2018.
Kazi Akiluddin Sujaoddin and another. - VERSUS-
The State of Maharashtra and others.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : FEBRUARY 16, 2018.
Heard Shri R.D. Karode, learned counsel
for petitioners and Shri A. Chutke, learned A.G.P. for respondent nos. 1 to 3.
Order
1602wp928.18
2
subsequent notification on 10.04.2015 under Section 11 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Petitioners were therefore, given leave to make appropriate representation.
no substance in the petition. Writ Petition is, therefore, rejected. No costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to rental compensation for land after the date of market value determination.
Whether a subsequent notification under Section 11 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act creates a fresh basis for rental compensation.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kazi Akiluddin Sujaoddin
The State of Maharashtra
B. P. Dharmadikari
Mrs. Swapna Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
