The High Court disposed of the writ petition allowing the petitioners two weeks to furnish documents required by the Corporation, with protection granted for that period. Non-compliance would invite further action.
Two weeks protection granted to furnish documents; further action by Corporation if not provided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(2)wp-9174.doc
rkmore
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.9174 OF 2014
Bharat Soni & Ors. ..Petitioners
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr.A.S. Rao, i/by Mr.Prashant Kamble for the Petitioners.
Ms.Nisha Mehra, AGP for Respondent No.1.
Mr.S.M. Kammble, for Respondent No.2.
Ms.Minal Chandnani, for Respondent No.6.
CORAM: NARESH H. PATIL, ACTING C.J. AND G.S.KULKARNI, J.
DATE: 19th October, 2018
P.C.:-
Corporation shall proceed to take further action.
Stand over to two weeks for compliance.
G.S.KULKARNI, J. ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
1/1
Bharat Soni & Ors.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Naresh H. Patil
G.S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
