Petitioner moved for withdrawal of the writ petition citing a subsequent Government Notification. The Court granted leave and disposed of the petition.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; writ petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
3-wp 9089-15.doc
psv
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.9089 OF 2015
Udyog Bank Sevak And Sevaketar Vishesh Magasvarg Sahakari Grih Nirman Sahakari Sansta Maryadit
.. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra through the Principal Secretary & Anr. ..Respondents
Dr. R.P. Sabban for Petitioner.
Ms.Nisha Mehra, AGP for Respondent No.1. Mr.Samir Kumbhakoni for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL, ACTING C.J. AND G.S. KULKARNI, J. DATE : 3rd SEPTEMBER 2018
P.C.:
The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in view of the Government Notification dated 10th July 2018 under the Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966, this petition becomes infructuous. The learned Counsel seeks leave to withdraw this petition.
G.S. KULKARNI ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
Udyog Bank Sevak And Sevaketar Vishesh Magasvarg Sahakari Grih Nirman Sahakari Sansta Maryadit
The State of Maharashtra through the Principal Secretary
NARESH H. PATIL
G.S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
