Shri. Dilip Shivdas Gwalbansi v. State of Maharashtra Thr. Police Station Officer Gittikhadan Police Station Nagpur and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20-wp-859-17
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.859 OF 2017 (Shri Sharad Jagatnarayan Tiwari vs. State of Maharashtra ) WITH
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITIOBN NO.896 OF 2017
(Shri Dilip Shivdas Gwalbansi vs. State of Maharashtra)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Mr. Abhishek S. Shukla, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. N.R. Patil, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & M. G. GIRATKAR, JJ .
DATE : 5.3.2018
1] Perusal of the First Information Report would reveal that, the allegations contained therein contain the ingredients to constitute the offence, for which the Petitioner is charged.
2] No case is therefore made out for interference in extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petition is rejected.
JUDGE JUDGE
**_BDP-SPS_*
Shri Sharad Jagatnarayan Tiwari
Shri Dilip Shivdas Gwalbansi
State of Maharashtra
B. R. GAVAI
M. G. GIRATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court