Disposed
Avinash Shashikant Shah v. the Administrator New Cidco Waluj Aurangabad and Another
Bombay HCWP/8629/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp8629.17
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 8629 OF 2017
AVINASH SHASHIKANT SHAH VERSUS
THE ADMINISTRATOR NEW CIDCO WALUJ AURANGABAD AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Kulkarni Pramod A.
CORAM : V. K. JADHAV, J. DATED : 9th JANUARY, 2018
PER COURT :-
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition. Leave granted. Writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
rlj/
AVINASH SHASHIKANT SHAH
THE ADMINISTRATOR NEW CIDCO WALUJ AURANGABAD
V. K. JADHAV
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court