Single judge rejected a writ petition filed regarding a temporary injunction in a land dispute. The court held that the petitioner failed to prove possession. Consequently, the impugned orders were not faulted. The petition was disposed of without intervention.
Petition rejected; trial court directed to proceed expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP-8603-18.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 8603 OF 2018
Khudratulla s/o Vajir Beg .. Petitioner
versus
Mohammad Jafar Kha Usman Kha and others .. Respondents
Mr Shailesh P. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for petitioner
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 1st August, 2018
ORDER :
2. Petition has been preferred against concurrent findings
in respect of prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable loss required to be taken into account at the time of considering grant of temporary injunction.
making a claim that petitioner's father being a protected tenant, the petitioner has not been able to show his possession over suit property.
WP-8603-18.doc
2
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JUDGE
pnd/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow a writ petition challenging orders passed by authorities denying temporary injunction in a tenancy dispute.
Khudratulla s/o Vajir Beg
Mohammad Jafar Kha Usman Kha and others
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
