This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20-wp-859-17
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.859 OF 2017 (Shri Sharad Jagatnarayan Tiwari vs. State of Maharashtra ) WITH
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITIOBN NO.896 OF 2017
(Shri Dilip Shivdas Gwalbansi vs. State of Maharashtra)
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Mr. Abhishek S. Shukla, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. N.R. Patil, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & M. G. GIRATKAR, JJ .
DATE : 5.3.2018
1] Perusal of the First Information Report would reveal that, the allegations contained therein contain the ingredients to constitute the offence, for which the Petitioner is charged.
2] No case is therefore made out for interference in extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Petition is rejected.
JUDGE JUDGE
**_BDP-SPS_*
Shri Sharad Jagatnarayan Tiwari
State of Maharashtra
B. R. Gavai
M. G. Giratkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
