Niraj Mansulhlal Ved v. the State of Maharashtra through the Ministry of Urban Development and 5 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
DDR IN THE HIGH COURT
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DDR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 498 OF 2018
Niraj Mansulhlal Ved ...Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents
Mr. V.A. Thorat, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Prayag Joshi, Mr. Bipin Joshi for the petitioner.
Mr. Hemant Haryan, AGP for respondent No.1.
Mr. Girish Utangale with Mr. Suyesh Gadre i/by M/s. Utangale & Co. for respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4.
Ms. Trupti Puranik for respondent Nos.5 and 6.
CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & M.S.KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 14th MARCH, 2018.
P.C. :
After arguing for sometime learned Counsel for the
petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh petition after taking appropriate steps
in regard to the removal of unauthorized construction.
( M.S.KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)
1/1
Niraj Mansulhlal Ved
The State of Maharashtra
SHANTANU S. KEMKAR
M.S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court