In Writ Petition No. 831 of 2018, the Acting Chief Justice disposed of the petition solely on the corporation counsel's submission regarding time limits for decision-making, without addressing substantive merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4. os wp 831-18.doc
R.M. AMBERKAR (Private Secretary)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
WRIT PETITION NO. 831 OF 2018
Mohd. Usman S/o. Abdul Aziz Ansari .. Petitioner
Versus
The Municipal Commissioner for Greater Mumbai & Ors.
.. Respondents
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL, ACTING C.J. &
G.S. KULKARNI, J.
DATE : OCTOBER 29, 2018.
P.C.:
1. Learned counsel for the Corporation submits that in
case, the petitioner submits the requisite documents to the designated authority within two weeks, the designated authority shall take decision within four weeks thereafter and
communicate the same to the petitioner. In view of this
statement, Writ Petition is disposed of.
[ G.S. KULKARNI, J. ] [ ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ]
1 of 1
Mohd. Usman S/o. Abdul Aziz Ansari
The Municipal Commissioner for Greater Mumbai & Ors.
NARESH H. PATIL
G.S. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
