Two writ petitions were disposed of. The Court noted that the Petitioners were no longer interested in prosecuting the matters, leading to the disposal of the petitions.
Petitions disposed of as Petitioners are not interested in prosecuting.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk
13-4-5-10-WP-763-830-17.doc
1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.763 OF 2017
Shri Manoj Prakash Yelgulwar vs.
State of Maharashtra through its Secretary and Anr.
..Petitioner
...Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.830 OF 2017
Shri Kureshi Riyaj Ayub and Ors. vs. State Electricity Officer and Ors.
..Petitioners
...Respondents
Mr.Vishwasrao S. Deokar i/b Ms. Ujawala V. Karpe for the Petitioners. Mr. Manish M. Pabale, AGP for the Respondent No.1. Mr. D.G. Dhanure for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & P. N. DESHMUKH, JJ. DATE : 8th FEBRUARY, 2018
P.C.:
. Mr.Deokar, the learned counsel for the Petitioners on instructions states that with the passage of time, the Petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petitions. In view of this statement, the Petitions will not survive and the same are disposed of.
(P.N. DESHMUKH, J)
(A.S. OKA, J.)
Shri Manoj Prakash Yelgulwar
State of Maharashtra through its Secretary and Anr.
Shri Kureshi Riyaj Ayub and Ors.
State Electricity Officer and Ors.
A.S. OKA
P.N. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
