This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp 7863.17.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.7863 OF 2017
Bhausaheb S/o Kachru Waghule & others Petitioners Versus The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents
Mr.C.K. Shinde advocate for the petitioners Mr.S.N. Kendre, AGP for Respondent No.3 Mr. S.K. Kadam advocate for respondent No.1 & 2 Mr. Kotkar advocate for respondent Nos.4 and 5.
V.K. JADHAV,J
(Date: January 29th, 2018)
PER COURT :-
For the reasons separately recorded while disposing of Writ petition No.763 of 2017 today, the instant writ petition does not survive and hence stand disposed of.
( V.K. JADHAV, J)
vbd
Bhausaheb S/o Kachru Waghule & others
The State of Maharashtra
V.K. Jadhav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
