The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition as infructuous due to subsequent developments without detailed reasoning.
The Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
3.wp 7296-13.doc
DDR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 7296 OF 2013
Dr. Vasant Vithoba Badve .. Petitioner Vs. The State of Maharashtra & ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Gautam S. Hiranandani h/for Mr. C.G. Gavnekar for the petitioner.
Mr. V.M. Mali, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Mr. A.B. Borkar for respondent No.4.
CORAM : B.R.GAVAI & M.S. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 21st AUGUST, 2018
P.C. :
The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that
in view of subsequent development, the petition is rendered
infructuous. The Writ Petition is disposed of as such.
(M.S. KARNIK, J.) ( B.R.GAVAI, J.)
1/1
Dr. Vasant Vithoba Badve
The State of Maharashtra
B.R. Gavai
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
