Writ petition withdrawn by petitioner after retirement from service.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
vinita
1 WP72-11 dt -17.10.18
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 72 OF 2011.
Meena Madhukar Phal …Petitioners.
Versus
State of Goa and 2 others. ...Respondents
Mr. J. Karn, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. S. Dhargalkar, Additional Government Advocate for Respondents.
Coram : N.M. Jamdar & Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ.
Date : 17 October 2018.
P.C.:
Petition was adjourned at the request of the learned Counsel for
the Petitioner to decide whether the Petitioner is desirous of
prosecuting the Petition. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner
states that he has received instructions to withdraw the Petition as the
Petitioner has retired from the service.
2. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
Prithviraj K. Chavan, J.N.M. Jamdar, J.
Meena Madhukar Phal
State of Goa
2 others
Prithviraj K. Chavan
N.M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court