Petitions challenging part-time instructor appointments declared infructuous by the High Court of Bombay were disposed of as having become irrelevant due to subsequent events.
Petitions and associated Civil Application No.10958/2012 stood disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7056.12WP+
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.7056 OF 2012
...
ATUL S/O.VYANKARAO KAMBLE
VERSUS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS
...
WITH
WRIT PETITION NO.7051 OF 2012
...
GAJANAN S/O.NILKANTHRAO BANDE
VERSUS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS
...
Mr.K.R.Doke, Advocate for the petitioners
Ms.S.S.Raut, AGP for the respondent/State
Mr.S.B.Pulkundwar, Advocate for respondent nos.2,
3 and 4.
...
CORAM: S.S. SHINDE AND
S.M.GAVHANE, JJ.
DATE : 24.02.2018
ORDER:
1]Learned counsel appearing for the
petitioners submits that the period for which the
petitionerswereappointedaspart-time
Instructors has been completed, and in view of the
subsequent events occurred after filing these
Petitions, the Petitions have been rendered
infructuous.
2]In the light of the statement of the
learned counsel appearing for the petitioners,
both the Petitions stand disposed of.
7056.12WP+
2
3]In view of disposal of Writ Petition
No.7056/2012, Civil Application No.10958/2012 does
not survive, and the same stands disposed of.
[S.M.GAVHANE] [S.S.SHINDE]
JUDGE JUDGE
DDC
ATUL S/O.VYANKARAO KAMBLE
GAJANAN S/O.NILKANTHRAO BANDE
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.S. SHINDE
S.M.GAVHANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court