In WP No. 693 of 2014, the High Court at Aurangabad disposed of a writ petition filed by Vasantrao Uttamrao Patil as infructuous on instructions from the petitioner's counsel, without hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
26-wp.693-14.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 693 OF 2014
VASANTRAO UTTAMRAO PATIL
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr.Y.B.Bolkar, Advocate i/b. Mr.N.N.Desale, Advocate
for petitioner
Mr.N.T.Bhagat, AGP for respondents
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND
R.G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 17, 2018
PER COURT
The learned Counsel for the petitioner, on
instructions, states that the relief claimed by the
petitioner has become infructuous.
2.In the circumstances, the petition is disposed
of as infructuous. No costs.
[R.G. AVACHAT, J.] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
kbp
VASANTRAO UTTAMRAO PATIL
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.V. GANGAPURWALA
R.G. AVACHAT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court