Writ petition moved for withdrawal was allowed and disposed of as no objection was raised by the respondent to the withdrawal based on enclosed consent terms.
Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn and disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
502wp68452018.odt
Shailaja
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.6845 OF 2018
Naginbhai Maganlal Kapadia ] Petitioner
Vs.
Gama Constructions Private Limited ] Respondent
Ms. Sheetal Mehta i/b FZB & Associates, for Petitioner. Mr. R.M. Haridas, for the Respondent.
CORAM : R.G. KETKAR, J.
DATE : 19TH SEPTEMBER, 2018.
P.C:
Not on board. At the request of Ms. Mehta, taken up in the production board.
1 of 1
Naginbhai Maganlal Kapadia
Gama Constructions Private Limited
R.G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
