This petition was disposed of without great observations. The Court directed the respondent No.1 to decide a representation from the petitioners within eight weeks.
Respondent No.1 directed to decide the petitioners' representation within 8 weeks and communicate the decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp6788.12
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6788 OF 2012
DATTATRAYA PANDURANG JADHAV AND ORS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
Mr.G.K.Kshirsagar, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mrs.V.S.Choudhari, AGP for respondent/State.
Mr.U.B. Bondar, Advocate for R-4 to 6.
CORAM : S.S.SHINDE &
S.M.GAVHANE,JJ.
DATED :09.04.2018
P.C. :-
1.Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners
submits that the petitioners would be satisfied in-case
respondent No.1 is directed to decide the representation
of the petitioners at Exh.“H” (page No.57 of the
petition), within stipulated period.
2.We direct respondent No.1 to decide the
aforesaid representation, if already not decided, within
8 (eight) weeks from today, on its own merits and
communicate the said decision to the petitioners.
3.Needless to observe that in-case respondent No.1
wishes to hear the petitioners, it would be open for
respondent No.1 adopt such course.
( 2 ) wp6788.12
4.With above observations, the writ petition
stands disposed of.
5.Parties to act upon authenticated copy of this
order.
[S.M.GAVHANE,J.][S.S.SHINDE,J.]
snk/2018/APR18/ wp6788.12
Dattatraya Pandurang Jadhav and Ors
The State of Maharashtra and Ors
S.S.Shinde
S.M.Gavhane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court