The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed Writ Petition No. 668 of 2015 as not prosecuted since the petitioner failed to appear on twice without assigning cause.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6 wp 668-15.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 668 OF 2015
Vaibhav Suresh Phale
.. Petitioner
v/s.
Mumbai Housing & Area Development Board & Ors.
..Respondents
None for the Petitioner. Mr. Himanshu Takke, AGP for the State.
CORAM : RANJIT MORE &
SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. DATED : JUNE 28, 2018.
P.C. :
September, 2016, and 24th April, 2018 none appeared for the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence the petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.)
1 of 1
salgaonkar
Vaibhav Suresh Phale
Mumbai Housing & Area Development Board
Ranjit More
Anuja PrabhuDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
