The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad disposed of Writ Petition No. 6362 of 2017 on the ground that further developments and examination of witnesses rendered the writ petition inefficacious.
Writ petition stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP-6362-16.doc
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 6362 OF 2016
Dinkar s/o Venka Munde and others
.. Petitioners
versus
Uttam s/o Rajaram Munde and others .. Respondents
Mr S. A. Ambad, Advocate for petitioners Mr A. R. Tapse, Advocate h/f Mr P. D. Suryawanshi Advocate for respondents no. 1 and 2
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 6th August, 2018
0RDER :
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, JUDGE
pnd/-
Dinkar s/o Venka Munde
Uttam s/o Rajaram Munde
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
