Petitioner filed a writ petition. Subsequent affidavit by Raju Tadvi treated as undertaking, showing grievance no longer survives. Petition disposed of without hearing.
Petition disposed of on acceptance of undertaking in affidavit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7-os-wp-617-16.doc .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 617 OF 2016
Parvati Lakshmanan and ors. .. Petitioners. Versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others ..Respondents
Mr. Rahul Walia for the Petitioner. Mr.B.V. Bukhari for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4.
CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE : 24th JANUARY, 2018.
P.C.
averments in sub-paras c, d and e of paragraph 4 of the said affidavit, we find that the grievance of the petitioner no more survives. The statements made in the said affidavit are treated as
undertaking to this Court and accepted.
[B. P. COLABAWALLA, J.] [B. R. GAVAI, J.]
1 of 1
DSS
Parvati Lakshmanan and ors.
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others
B. R. Gavai
B. P. Colabawalla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
