Disposed

Sau. Hina W/O Tulshidas Bhaisare v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Rural Development and Water Resources Department, Mumbai and

Bombay HC25 Sept 2018WP/6161/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Disposal of identical writ petitions filed by indigent women seeking pensions. The court directed the Divisional Commissioner to decide a representation within four weeks after affording an opportunity of hearing.

What did the court decide?

Directing the Divisional Commissioner to decide the representation within four weeks after giving an opportunity of hearing.

Sau. Hina W/O Tulshidas Bhaisare Vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

wp6149.18.O.odt 1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.6149 OF 2018

¶4

(Ku. Riangala d/o Murlidhar Waghaye (Now Sau. Riangala w/o Sheshrao Landge) Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. its Secretary, Rural Development & Water Resources Department, Mumbai and another)

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.6150 OF 2018

¶6

(Sau. Shubhangi w/o Suresh Girhepunje Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. its Secretary, Rural Development & Water Resources Department, Mumbai and others)

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO.6151 OF 2018

¶8

(Sau. Varsha w/o Ashok Nanhe (Ku. Varsha d/o Dayaram Waghdhare) Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. its Secretary, Rural Development & Water Resources Department,

¶9

Mumbai and others)

¶10

WRIT PETITION NO.6152 OF 2018

¶11

(Mahagan s/o Ramji Hatwar Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. its Secretary, Rural Development & Water Resources Department, Mumbai and others)

¶12

WRIT PETITION NO.6153 OF 2018

¶13

(Sau. Mira w/o Gowardhan Wanjari Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. its Secretary, Rural Development & Water Resources Department, Mumbai and others)

¶14

WRIT PETITION NO.6155 OF 2018

¶15

(Ku. Sandhya d/o Rama Samarth Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. its Secretary, Rural Development & Water Resources Department, Mumbai and others)

¶16

WRIT PETITION NO.6156 OF 2018

¶17

(Sau. Shubhangi w/o Sheshrao Bopche (Ku. Rekha Duryodhan Pardhikar) Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. its Secretary, Rural Development & Water Resources Department, Mumbai and others)

¶18

WRIT PETITION NO.6157 OF 2018

¶19

(Ku. Sarita d/o Prabhakar Shrikhande (Sau. Sarita w/o Vilas Kalejwar) Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. its Secretary, Rural Development & Water Resources Department,

¶20

Mumbai and others)

¶21

WRIT PETITION NO.6158 OF 2018

¶22

(Sau. Gita w/o Sambhaji Wadhai Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. its Secretary, Rural Development & Water Resources Department, Mumbai and others)

¶23

WRIT PETITION NO.6159 OF 2018

¶24

(Achal s/o Tarachand Damle Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. its Secretary, Rural Development & Water Resources Department, Mumbai and others)

¶25

wp6149.18.O.odt 2

¶26

WRIT PETITION NO.6160 OF 2018

¶27

(Sau. Vijaya w/o Ramkrushna Giripunje Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. its Secretary, Rural Development & Water Resources Department, Mumbai and others)

¶28

WRIT PETITION NO.6162 OF 2018

¶29

(Sau. Shila w/o Krushna Selokar Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. its Secretary, Rural Development & Water Resources Department, Mumbai and others)

¶30

WRIT PETITION NO.6161 OF 2018

¶31

(Sau. Hina w/o Tulshidas Bhaisare Vs. State of Maharashtra thr. its Secretary, Rural Development & Water Resources Department, Mumbai and others)

¶32

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar’s Orders.

¶33

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Shri V.N. Patre, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri S.Y. Deopujari, G.P. for Respondent Nos.1 & 2.

¶34

CORAM: B.R. GAVAI AND

¶35

ROHIT B. DEO, JJ. DATE: 25th SEPTEMBER, 2018.

¶36

Heard.

¶37

2] In view of the order passed in identical petitions, the petitions are disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to the Divisional Commissioner.

¶38

3] The Divisional Commissioner is directed to decide the representation within a period of four weeks after giving an opportunity of hearing to the parties concern.

¶39

JUDGE

¶40

JUDGE

¶41

NSN

Sau. Hina W/O Tulshidas Bhaisare v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Rural Development and Water Resources Department, Mumbai and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sau. Hina W/O Tulshidas Bhaisare v. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Rural Development and Water Resources Department, Mumbai and

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prakash Raksu Mogare Vs Shri. H.D. Takarkhede, Chief Officer, Municipal Council, Mohapa, Nagpur

Shri. Nishant Kallulathil Devarajan and Others Vs Miss. Sonal D/O. Laxmidas Sonkavde (Kalulathil)

Ranjeet S/O Dattatray Harne and Another Vs the State of Mah., Thr. Its Secretary, Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairy Development and 1

Shubham S/O Kashiram Nannaware (Minor) Thr. Natural Guardian Father Kashiram Maroti Nannaware Vs Vice-Chairman/Member Sec. Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Gadchiroli and Ors.

Shubham S/O Kashiram Nannaware (Minor) Thr. Natural Guardian Father Kashiram Maroti Nannaware Vs Vice-Chairman/Member Sec. Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Gadchiroli and Ors.

Himanshu S/O Digambar Randive Vs Vice-Chairman/Member Sec. Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur and Ors.