Petitioners sought withdrawal of writ petition due to dismantling of the structure. Court granted permission and disposed of petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw petition was granted and petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-6035.18.sxw
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.6035 OF 2018
Alfaaz Rauf Mansoori and Anr. … Petitioners Vs. Deputy Director, Town Planning, Nashik Municipal Corporation and Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Sandip Shinde i/by Ms. Kavita Totkekar for the Petitioners. Mr. Vaibhav Patankar for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mrs. R.A. Salunkhe, AGP for the Respondent No.3.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATE : 8th JUNE 2018
P.C.
1 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, on
instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the petition on the ground that the structure has been dismantled. Accordingly, petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J) (A.S. OKA, J)
1 of 1
Alfaaz Rauf Mansoori and Anr.
Deputy Director, Town Planning
A.S. Oka
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
