The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the Writ Petition, holding that disputed questions of fact cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction. The petition was therefore rejected and disposed of without prejudice to the petitioner's statutory remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DDR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 598 OF 2018
Alimuddin S. Ansari .. Petitioner Vs. M/s. HDIL Creative Value & anr. .. Respondents
None for the petitioner.
Mr. S.G. Surana I/by Mr. Madhur Surana for respondent No.1 Mr. Abhijit P. Kulkarni for respondent No.3.
CORAM : B.R.GAVAI &
M.S. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 3rd SEPTEMBER , 2018 P.C. :
The petition involves various disputed question of
facts. It cannot be gone into in writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petition is therefore rejected.
will not come in the way of the petitioner for pursuing the remedy which is available in law.
(M.S. KARNIK, J.) ( B.R.GAVAI, J.)
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether disputed questions of fact are triable in writ jurisdiction under Article 226.
Alimuddin S. Ansari
M/s. HDIL Creative Value & anr.
B.R. Gavai
M.S. Karnik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
