Petitioner sought to restrain private respondents from entering agreements without consent. Court held writ jurisdiction under Article 226 cannot extend to private parties for such relief and dismissed the petition.
Relief sought to restrain respondents from entering agreements without petitioner's consent was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5621 OF 2018.
Shaikh Aslam Abdul Kadar. Versus AbdulGani Haji Ahmed Memon and Another.
..Petitioner.
..Respondents.
Mr. Satyajeet Mirajkar for the Petitioner.
Coram : RANJIT MORE & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. Date : June 13, 2018 .
P. C. :
Petition is filed for the following relief :
“a) this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent herein not to enter into any agreement in respect of the suit premises without prior consent of the Petitioner.”
[SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.]
[RANJIT MORE, J.]
1 / 1
patilsr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether writ jurisdiction can extend to restrain private parties from entering into agreements regarding suit premises.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shaikh Aslam Abdul Kadar
AbdulGani Haji Ahmed Memon
Another
RANJIT MORE
ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
