This is a one-line order disposing of a writ petition as withdrawn. The learned counsel for the petitioner moved for leave to withdraw the present writ petition as the petitioner had been satisfied with the documents produced by the respondent and no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 535 OF 2018
BENZEETA R. SOUZA.,
Versus
MENINO A. FERNANDES AND ANR., ... Respondents
Shri Galileo Francisco Teles, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri C. A. Coutinho, Advocate for the respondent no.1. Ms. Susan Linhares, Additional Government Advocate for the respondent no.2.
Coram:C. V. BHADANG, J.
Date:26th July 2018
P.C.
Shri Teles, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has now been shown original receipt nos.3 and 4 dated 08/09/1996 as referred to in the rejoinder of the petitioner dated 17/05/2016, and the petitioner is now satisfied. In that view of the matter, the learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner, who is present before the Court, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
C. V. BHADANG, J.
SMA
BENZEETA R. SOUZA
MENINO A. FERNANDES
C. V. BHADANG
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
