The writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, keeping all contentions open.
Petition disposed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.5187 OF 2016
(Shriniwas Prabhakar Karve Vs. The State of
Maharashtra and others)
Mr. Suresh M. Kulkarni, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. A.S. Bajaj, Special Counsel for the respondents/
State
CORAM :S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND
R.G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATE :4th DECEMBER, 2018
ORDER :
Mr. Bajaj, the learned counsel for the
respondents has raised an objection that the
petitioner has an alternate remedy before the
Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. In light of that,
Mr. Kulkarni, learned counsel for the petitioner, on
instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the writ
petition with liberty to approach the Maharashtra
Administrative Tribunal.
2.The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn
with liberty as prayed for. All contentions of the
respective parties are kept open. The Maharashtra
Administrative Tribunal shall consider the time spent
in prosecuting the present writ petition.
[R.G. AVACHAT] [ S.V. GANGAPURWALA ] JUDGE JUDGE
npj/wp5187-2016
Shriniwas Prabhakar Karve
The State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
R.G. Avachat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court