Bhushan B. Kadam v. Jyoti B. Kadam
Case brief
What is this about?
The这是对一份关于维护延误的动议的驳回。高等法院裁定，由于动议人未能缴纳拖欠的抚养费，尽管已获得宽限，他无权获得衡平法救济，因此该动议被驳回。
What did the court decide?
Petition not entertained and dismissed. No order as to costs.
What the court decided
WP 5150-17.doc
Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 5150 OF 2017
Bhushan B. Kadam
.Petitioner
Vs.
Jyoti B. Kadam
.Respondent
Mr. P. J. Thorat, Advocate, for the Petitioner None for the Respondent
CORAM : M. S. SONAK, J. DATE : 24.11.2018
P.C.
. Heard Mr. Thorat, learned counsel for the Petitioner.
- By detailed order dated 20.03.2018, it was made clear
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a petitioner who fails to deposit arrears of maintenance despite granted indulgence is entitled to equitable relief in exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction.
Whether a writ petition should be entertained in the absence of compliance with a condition precedent regarding payment of maintenance arrears.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bhushan B. Kadam
- respondent
Jyoti B. Kadam
Coram
M. S. Sonak
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court