Petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition, which was granted with liberty to prosecute the pending appeal. The writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to prosecute pending appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp4919
1
ssp
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4919 OF 2018
Office Notes, Office
Memorandam of Coram,
appearances, Court’s ordersCourt’s or Judge’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
Mr.Manish Gaikwad i/b Mr.E.A.Sasi for the Petitioner
Mr.Sandeep Marne for the Respondent Nos.s1 to 4 and 7.
Mr.C.M.Lokesh and Ms J. Pandey i/b A.R.Bhole & Co. for
respondent No.5.
CORAM :A.S.OKA AND
RIYAZ.I.CHAGLA,JJ.
DATE :JUNE 18, 2018
P.C.:
1 The Advocate appearing for the
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw
this petition. Accordingly, writ
petition is disposed of as withdrawn
with liberty to prosecute the pending
appeal in accordance with law.
(RIYAZ.I.CHAGLA,J.)(A.S.OKA,J.)
Office Notes, Office Memorandam
Respondent Nos.s1 to 4 and 7
respondent No.5
A.S.OKA
RIYAZ.I.CHAGLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court