Petitioners sought withdrawal of the criminal writ petition to pursue discharge remedy before the trial court, which was allowed.
Withdrawal of the writ petition allowed to pursue discharge remedy before the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Dusane 1 911 wp 44.2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.44 OF 2016
Smt. Ashwini Rajendrakumar Tirmake … Petitioners & Anr.
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents
Mr. M.K. Kocharekar i/by Mr. Ganesh Bhujbal for the Petitioners. Mrs. S.V. Sonawane, Addl. P. P. for State.
CORAM :- R. M. SAVANT & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE :- 17TH APRIL, 2018
P. C. :-
1 The learned counsel for the Petitioners after arguing the matter at some length seeks withdrawal of the above petition to pursue the remedy of discharge before the trial Court. The petition is accordingly allowed to be withdrawn. If any application for discharge is filed, needless to state that the same would be decided on it's own merits and in accordance with law expeditiously.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (R. M. SAVANT, J.)
1 of 1
Smt. Ashwini Rajendrakumar Tirmake
State of Maharashtra
R. M. Savant
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
