The Court disposed of a writ petition and civil application seeking registration of petitioners as security guards, directing the respondent board to decide expeditiously. The earlier status order was vacated.
Directed respondent No. 1 to consider applications for registration of security guards expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 38) wp4159-18.doc
SAS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4159 OF 2018 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1318 OF 2018
Yogesh L. Pawar & Ors. ..Petitioners. V/s.
Security Guards Board for Greater Mumbai and Thane District A Statutory Board & Ors. ..Respondents.
Mr.Santosh S.Jagtap for the petitioners.
Ms.Swati Deshpande with Ms.Niyatu Merchant i/b. MDP Partners for respondent No.2 / applicant.
Mr.M.M.Pabale, AGP for respondent No..4
CORAM: SHANTANU KEMKAR NITIN W.SAMBRE, JJ.
DATE : JULY 5, 2018
P.C.:-
Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and the applicant in Civil Application No.1318 of 2018, we dispose of the Civil Application as also the Writ Petition by directing respondent No.1 to consider and take appropriate decision in the applications submitted by the petitioners for registering them as Security Guards with the Board as expeditiously as possible.
2 38) wp4159-18.doc
( NITIN W.SAMBRE, J. ) ( SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)
Yogesh L. Pawar & Ors.
Security Guards Board for Greater Mumbai and Thane District
A Statutory Board & Ors.
Shantanu Kemkar
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
