Petitioner challenged a communication cancelling development work subsidy. The Bench observed that a subsequent government clarification redressed the grievance and disposed of the petition without costs.
Writ petition disposed of. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
1709wp4134.17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR .
WRIT PETITION NO. 4134 OF 2017
(Harish s/o Mahadeosingh Raval vs. The State of Maharashtra thr. its Secretary, Urban Development Department & Ors.)
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,_____________________________________________________________________________ appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & M.G. GIRATKAR, JJ. SEPTEMBER 17, 2018.
Heard Shri A.S. Mardikar, learned Senior Advocate with Shri D.I. Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri S.P. Deshpande, learned Additional GP for respondent Nos. 1 & 2 and Shri P.P. Deshmukh, learned counsel for respondent No. 3.
2
1709wp4134.17
JUDGE
JUDGE
*GS.
Digitally signed Gopichand by GopichandTanwarram Tanwarram Shamdasani Shamdasani Date: 2018.09.17 15:11:15 +0530
Harish
The State of Maharashtra
Municipal Council
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
M.G. GIRATKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
