In this writ petition, the petitioner challenged the status of an administrative appeal filed by him. The Court observed that the appeal was allowed, redressing the petitioner's grievance, and thus disposed of the petition without costs.
The writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10-wp.4058.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4058 OF 2016
NANDKISHOR DAMODAR UPASANI
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr.Hemant Surve, Advocate for petitioner
Mrs.M.A.Deshpand, Addl. Govt. Pleader for respondent
no.1
Mr.R.S.Deshmukh, Advocate for respondent nos.2 to 4
Mr.S.V.Adwant, Advocate for respondent no.6
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND
R.G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 10, 2018
PER COURT
It is submitted that the administrative appeal
filed by the petitioner has been allowed.
2.In the light of the above, the grievance of
the petitioner has been redressed. The Writ Petition
is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs.
[R.G. AVACHAT, J.] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
kbp
NANDKISHOR DAMODAR UPASANI
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S.V. GANGAPURWALA
R.G. AVACHAT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court