The High Court of Bombay disposed of this writ petition keeping alternate legal remedies open to the petitioner without granting any relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
932 sr.no..odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
932 WRIT PETITION NO. 3906 OF 2018
MAHESH SHANKARLAL SHANKARPELLI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Deshmukh Swapnil A AGP for Respondents: Mr. S.S. Dande
CORAM : R.M. BORDE & K.K. SONAWANE, JJ.
DATE : 18th April, 2018.
PER COURT:-
It would be open for the petitioner to avail of the alternate remedies available in law. Keeping the said option open, writ petition stands disposed of.
[K.K.SONAWANE, J] [R.M. BORDE, J]
grt/-
MAHESH SHANKARLAL SHANKARPELLI
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
R.M. BORDE
K.K. SONAWANE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
