The High Court at Aurangabad rejected a writ petition challenging an order which the court found faultless. The court directed the Civil Judge, Latur, to dispose of the pending Hindu Marriage case within six months.
Writ petition rejected; direction to Civil Judge, Latur to dispose of Hindu Marriage Petition within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
wp3867-18
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3867 OF 2018
Sachin Tukaram Gude PETITIONER
VERSUS
Surekha Sachin Gude RESPONDENT
Mr. Suhas P. Urgunde, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. N. D. Kendre, Advocate for the respondent
[CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.]
DATE : 8th AUGUST, 2018
ORDER :
{2} wp3867-18
with Hindu Marriage Petition No. 44 of 2017 (Old No. 12 of 2015) pending between the parties as expeditiously as possible and preferably dispose of the same within a period of six months from the date of receipt of writ of this order.
[SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.]
drp/wp3867-18
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order of the lower court is liable to be faulted and deserves writ intervention.
Agreement of parties to expedite disposal of pending matrimonial proceedings.
Sachin Tukaram Gude
Surekha Sachin Gude
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
