Hanumant Dnyanu Jagdale v. the State of Maharashtra
Case brief
What is this about?
The single judge of the Bombay High Court, being due to paucity of time, adjourned the matter and ordered ad-interim relief to continue until the next hearing date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 382 OF 2016
Hanumant Dnyanu Jagdale ....Petitioner V/S The State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent
CORAM : R.M. SAVANT. & SMT. REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ DATE : 15th June, 2018
P.C. :
Due to paucity of time the matter is adjourned Stand Over to 13/07/2018. Ad-interim relief if any to continue till then.
( FOR REGISTRAR JUDICIAL - I )
Page 1/1
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Hanumant Dnyanu Jagdale
- respondent
The State Of Maharashtra
Coram
R.M. Savant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court