Writ petition for Grampanchayat Neral dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear on two consecutive call dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 3716 OF 2016
Grampanchayat Neral. Versus
State of Maharashtra & Others.
..Petitioner.
..Respondents.
None for the Petitioner.
Mrs. M. P. thakur, AGP for the Respondent-State.
Coram : RANJIT MORE & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ. Date : January 25, 2018 .
P. C. :
session, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner, therefore it was kept back. Now, matter is again called out in the afternoon session. However, at the second call also none appears for the petitioner. Hence, writ petition is dismissed for default.
[SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]
1 / 1
patilsr
Grampanchayat Neral
State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
Anuja Prabhudessai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
