Disposed

Sudarshan Garments Thru Proprietor M S Kute v. Shri Chhatrapati Rajarshi Shahu Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd. Beed

Bombay HC15 Jan 2018WP/364/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Aurangabad disposed of a writ petition challenging the recovery proceedings. The respondent bank extended time for deposit, and the court held no further orders were necessary.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition stands disposed of on the submission that time was extended by the respondent bank.

What the court decided

Sudarshan Garments Thru Proprietor M S Kute Vs Shri… — Banking and Recovery | Bombay HC (2018)

¶1

364.18WP

¶2

¶3

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO. 364 OF 2018

¶7

SUDARSHAN GARMENTS THRU PROPRIETOR M. S. KUTE

¶8

VERSUS

¶9

SHRI CHHATRAPATI RAJARSHI SHAHU URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD BEED

¶10

...

¶11

Advocate for the petitioner:Mr.M.S. Shaikh
holding for Mr. M.U. Shelke
Advocate for Respondent:Mr.K.J.Suryawanshi

¶12

...

¶13

CORAM: S.S.SHINDE & S.M. GAVHANE, JJ. Dated: January 15, 2018

¶14

Learned counsel appearing for the
Respondent submits that, the Respondent
has extended time to deposit the amount.
He has tendered across the Bar
undertaking given by the petitioner on
10th January, 2018. The same is taken on
recordandmarkedas`X'for
identification.

¶15

2.In the light of the contents of the

¶16

364.18WP

¶17

¶18

said undertaking, it appears that, the
time is extended by the Respondent to
facilitate the petitioner to deposit the
entire loan amount. In that view of the
matter, no further orders are necessary
in the present Petition. Therefore, the
Petition stands disposed of accordingly.

¶19

(S.M. GAVHANE,J) (S.S. SHINDE,J)

¶20

SGA/

Sudarshan Garments Thru Proprietor M S Kute v. Shri Chhatrapati Rajarshi Shahu Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd. Beed

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Sudarshan Garments Thru Proprietor M S Kute v. Shri Chhatrapati Rajarshi Shahu Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd. Beed

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Giridhar Trimbak Chinchole (Died) Thr Lrs Kadu Giridhar Chinchole (Patil) Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

The Vaidyanath Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd, Beed Vs Rajabhau Digambarrao Jabde, through Gpa Ankush Rajabhau Jabde and Others

Narayan Haridas Ade Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bhagwan Maruti Ampalkar Vs the National Highway Authority of India the Project Director and Others

Bhagwan Maruti Ampalkar Vs the National Highway Authority of India the Project Director and Others

Raghunath Laxman Deshmukh Died Lrs Suresh Raghunath Deshmukh and Others Vs the National Highway Authority of India the Project Director and Others