The petitioner, having admitted an alternate remedy of filing a revision petition, was permitted to withdraw the criminal writ petition with liberty to avail of that remedy. The court directed that the pendency of the writ petition be taken into account regarding delay. No substantive dispute was resolved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
crwp362.18.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.362/2018
Vandana w/o Bhimrao Shegaonkar ..vs.. Bhimrao s/o Kisan Shegaonkar
_______________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoramda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders of directions Court's or Judge's orders. and Registrar's Orders.
Mr. Sachin Zoting, Advocate for petitioner.
CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J, DATED : JULY 11, 2018
The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with above directions.
JUDGE
kahale
Vandana w/o Bhimrao Shegaonkar
Bhimrao s/o Kisan Shegaonkar
Manish Pitale
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
