This single-paragraph order disposes of Writ Petition No. 3546 of 2016. The court observed that the Zilla Parishad had considered the petitioner's claim and the relevant Government Resolution, holding that nothing survived for adjudication.
The writ petition is disposed of with no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 ) wp3546.16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 3546 OF 2016
MUBARAK KHA YUSUF KHA PATHAN
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr.Jagdish V. Deshpande, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr.K.N.Lokhande, AGP for the respondent/State
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA &
S.M.GAVHANE,JJ.
DATED :19.09.2018
P.C. :-
.Mr.Deshpande, learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that on 28.08.2018 the letter is
issued by the Zilla Parishad, Jalna and the claim of
the petitioner is considered.
2.Learned counsel for the Zilla Parishad
submits that the benefit of gratuity as per
Government Resolution dated 04.02.2015 is also being
considered by the Zilla Parishad.
3.In view of above nothing would survive in
the writ petition for adjudication and as such the
writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
[S.M.GAVHANE,J.] [S.V. GANGAPURWALA,J.]
VishalK/ wp3546.16
Mubarak Kha Yusuf Kha Pathan
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwal
S. M. Gavhane
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court