Disposed
Mr. Prasad Anil Kulkarni v. Union of India through the Secretary and Ors.
Bombay HCWP/3301/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
wp-3301-18.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-3301-18.doc
rpa 1/1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3301 OF 2018
Prasad Anil Kulkarni .. Petitioner V/s. Union of India & Ors. .. Respondents
…... Mr.Sanjay Kantawala a/w. Mr.Brijesh Pathak and Mr.Kartik Vig, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.Pradeep S. Jetly, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.
DATED : APRIL 2, 2018.
P.C. :
Mr.Jetly, on instructions, states that the Authorities will follow the due process of law and would not keep the issue pending beyond the period permissible therein.
2 In the light of this statement made today and also because an affidavit-in-reply is filed by the Authorities, giving such an undertaking (see paragraph 22), we dispose of this Writ Petition by clarifying that as far as merits are concerned, this Court has not expressed any opinion.
(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Prasad Anil Kulkarni
Union of India
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
PRAKASH D. NAIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court