Raju Madhukar Ingale... v. the State of Maharashtra and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
1 IN THE HIGH COURT
What did the court decide?
No costs, petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
0907wp3252.02
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 3252/2002.
Raju Madhukar Ingle (Thakur)
The State of Maharashtra and others.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI AND Z.A. HAQ, JJ.
DATE : JULY 09, 2018.
None appears for the petitioner even
today. There was no appearance even on 05.07.2018, when we have heard Shri N.R. Patil, learned A.G.P. for respondents, for some time.
prayer clause and to array of respondents to show that order of status-quo, granted by this Court on 13.01.2003, cannot and could not assist the petitioner in any way. The basic document, namely the Caste Certificate itself was not issued to him by respondent
Order
0907wp3252.02
2
no.2. Appeal preferred by him against that rejection is dismissed by respondent no.3 Scrutiny Committee.
costs.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
Raju Madhukar Ingle (Thakur)
The State of Maharashtra and others
B. P. Dharmdi
Z. A. Haq
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court